The certainty in settled principles of law is perhaps one of the cardinal tools that make us determine the course of litigation most times. It infuses a sort of confidence in our oral and written advocacy. It is quite easy to presume, I suppose, that a case fixed for mention cannot be heard on the return date ( Olubusola Stores v. Standard Bank Nig Ltd (1975) NSCC 137; Mbadinuju v. Ezuka (1994) 8 NWLR (pt. 364) 535),
Tuesday, 30 October 2018
Saturday, 27 October 2018
Choice of Counsel vs. Jurisdiction... What should the Court determine first?
One of the basic principles in our procedural law over the years is to always treat the issue of jurisdiction first whenever it is raised. It is quite elementary. Once an issue of jurisdiction has been raised, the general principle is that it ought to be resolved first before anything else in the proceedings.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
-
The Undefended list procedure recently caught my attention while reading through the pages of some new decisions of the apex court, the S...
-
The idea might seem innocuous. The simplicity approach which we attribute to what seems like a difference in the two documents - Affidav...
-
My attention was called to an authority a few days ago about the topic. I instantly recalled making an argument for the position taken by...