This is the third part of the series on a comparative analysis of the new Court of Appeal Rules, 2016 with the 2011 Rules. As with previous posts, reference to the Old and new Rules relate to the 2011 and 2016 Rules respectively. Previous discussions on the innovations of the new Rules can be found on this blog by clicking on Part 1, and Part 2. I intend to discuss the provisions relating to applications to court in this third post.
Friday, 21 July 2017
COURT OF APPEAL RULES 2016 (PART 3): APPLICATIONS TO COURT - A TIME CONSCIOUS COURT?
This is the third part of the series on a comparative analysis of the new Court of Appeal Rules, 2016 with the 2011 Rules. As with previous posts, reference to the Old and new Rules relate to the 2011 and 2016 Rules respectively. Previous discussions on the innovations of the new Rules can be found on this blog by clicking on Part 1, and Part 2. I intend to discuss the provisions relating to applications to court in this third post.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
-
The idea might seem innocuous. The simplicity approach which we attribute to what seems like a difference in the two documents - Affidav... -
The Undefended list procedure recently caught my attention while reading through the pages of some new decisions of the apex court, the S...
-
My attention was called to an authority a few days ago about the topic. I instantly recalled making an argument for the position taken by...